Sunday 27 January 2013

Semantic web/data journalism

The Internet is a main feature of society today, and probably will be for the foreseeable future. The history and facts about the internet have been explored previously in this unit, whereas now we are starting to dive deeper in the details and particulars of the internet. The World Wide Web, or WWW was invented by Tim Berners-Lee. We all know and use this system as a way to categorise our web pages in a way that we are familiar with and that we recognise.

The Semantic Web is similar to spoken language, as we speak in a way and a structure in which we can all understand, obviously depending on the language we're speaking. It sorts information into data which is easy to read for the computer, into numbers and equations which can be transferred into documents and other programmes.

In terms of Journalism, this can link to my job being to convey information and news to people in a way which they'd understand. For example, If I were reporting on a scientific matter such as a space feature, I would have to adapt and change the jargon and language to what everyone can understand.

Journalists often use data journalism to make things easier and simpler for everyone to understand, also in a quicker way. They've started using graphical methods of conveying information, for example in charts and tables.

This data journalism handbook can explain and give examples of data journalism with tributes from people all over the world, making it a global thing.

One particular example is the use of maps, particularly in online journalism however are also used in print and other methods. They're particularly helpful in showing links between areas for example if there was an outburst of robberies in a particular place. These are also often used on news bulletins.


This map may be used in any form of journalism to point out a particular place or correlation of evidence in this place.

Another example is that of charting youth unemployment.  This article uses charts and graphs to describe correlation between years and how many youths had employment.

Wednesday 16 January 2013

Wikipedia - should we use it?


Wikipedia is infamous for being the largest database quite literally anywhere. It would be physically impossible to fit the amount of information on Wikipedia in one book. Well that book would be incredibly heavy and impossible to read. Most students are told not to use it as an academic reference in any of their work. However, most students go to Wikipedia first to understand what ever it is they're writing about. So why don't teachers want you to get your information from one of the largest information databases ever created?

The problem with Wikipedia is that it's a self publishing database. Anyone anywhere can add their own information to it. Whatever is written in there is purely opinion and isn't necessarily fact. However, some academic scholars publish their works on Wikipedia Studies show that only 3.68% of each article published on Wikipedia was incorrect. 


Why do we use it?

Whenever you Google something, you can be sure Wikipedia is often the first, if not in the first five links that appear on the search engine. Not only popular, the way it is structured is extremely easy to read, which sub categories and sub headings everywhere so you don't have to read entire passages to gain the information you were looking for. 
It always involves links to other subjects or terms you might not understand or might be interested in. It also has all the information on one page so you don't have to keep searching and searching through endless pages of a boring online journal. Also, Wikipedia is completely free, very easy to use and access as long as you have an internet connection. 

One of the main problems with Wikipedia is the accuracy issue.

Some debates:

  • http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4530930.stm
  • http://www.lifeslittlemysteries.com/1011-how-accurate-is-wikipedia.html
  • http://www.pcworld.com/article/251796/has_wikipedia_beat_britannica_in_the_encyclopedia_battle_.html
There will always be a debate about the accuracy of the website, however it is entirely your choice of whether you use it or not. For finding out quick little facts about someone or a place  it's very useful, however in an academic piece of work it's often frowned upon as an academic reference because it's so obscure as to who wrote it, when and where the information came from.

Rhiannon has raised some very good points in her view on Wikipedia, I found it particularly interesting that ''Wikipedia are also able to block certain pages from being edited if they are considered at a 'high risk' of vandalism or propaganda, for example the pages on the Iraq War and the September 11th Attacks are blocked for editing by anybody who isn't a registered user with the right credentials.''  

Personally, I will always go to Wikipedia first if I don't understand a term or a concept, because of the easy understandings and accessibility it offers. It gives a definition or a statement at the top of the page in an easy to find and read format which is always helpful. I can understand why it is unsuitable for referencing in academic essays for example, however I do think If certain pages were to be verified and certified such as the pages on 9/11, they should be accepted as referenced and citied sources. 



References/ Read More:

Wikipedia Accuracy: http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html
http://www.livescience.com/7946-wikipedia-accurate.html




Cyberstalking

''Facebook stalk'' and ''Fraping'' are new terms used commonly in the English language today, although perhaps not in a standard manner. These phrases have derived from the now mainstream use of the social networking site Facebook.

Cyberstalking is a more recent phrase, with the word 'cyber' only recently becoming into vocabulary thanks to the popularisation of the use of 'cyber space' (the internet). This entitles a person using the internet/mobile phone to quite literally stalk a person. There are a variety of ways in which this could happen, either through social networking sites like Facebook or hacking accounts. They can also use calling and texting as a threat.

Statistics show that 74% of victims are all female. The stereotype of cyber stalking is usually a man stalking a woman for whatever reason, more than likely an ex girlfriend or with some form of relationship. It doesn't distinctly limit to one person. One cyber stalker could have hundreds of victims thanks to the ease and anonymity the internet allows you.
It's also not always men who commit the crime. As previously mentioned, the internet allows anyone to have anonymity. It requires no actual skill other than subtlety.

Victims of cyber stalking could have literally no idea they are being stalked. Someone could find out where you are simply with your phone, with new GPS systems that are programmed into smart phones such as iPhones. Facebook and Twitter are also social networking sites that people use carelessly, thinking nothing of sharing their personal information. 

There are laws which cyberstalking come under to help victims prosecute their attackers. Changes were made to these laws in 1997 to accommodate the new technology:


14. Section 2A(3) lists examples of behaviours associated with stalking. The list is not an exhaustive list but gives an indication of the types of behaviour that may be displayed in a stalking offence. The listed behaviours are:
  • following a person
  • contacting, or attempting to contact, a person by any means
  • publishing any statement or other material (i) relating or purporting to relate to a person, or (ii) purporting to originate from a person
  • monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication
  • loitering in any place (whether public or private)
  • interfering with any property in the possession of a person
  • watching or spying on a person
The problem with cyber stalking is that being on the internet gives you anonymity, and it's very hard to track someone. IP addresses can be tracked down by the police and investigators, however it's hard to tell who was on that computer, especially if they were using a public domain or in a different location. They can also use false or other peoples identities and therefore accounts/phones to commit their acts. 





The Digital Mind

The digital body has become a phonemonon that can prolong, save and make human life. Technology has been constructed to help us survive illnesses, injury and diseases. This in itself is truly amazing and previously thought impossible. Now, technology is supposedly affecting our minds. Not our brains, which technology can easily guide with pacemakers, wires and nerve endings. Our relationship with technology is becoming more and more dependant, and as humans we are becoming more lazy in our actions that technology can do easier and quicker for us, such as thinking.

As human beings we all have our own mind and free thought. Machinery is starting to adapt to this feature. Small things that we don't even think about whilst using technology show signs of technological intelligence, or artificial intelligence such as spell-check on Microsoft word, or the ''did you mean..'' tool used on Google.



Nothing will ever replace a human brain. Or so we think. It's been shown that humans only use a small amount of their entire brain capacity. As shown above, technology is being adapted to think for us. Robots is a common term often used in sci-fi films and books, however they are often not thought to be real things. There are many definitions for the world. Some people associate it with any form of machinery which moves without human support. Some people refer it to a mechanical version of a human. Robots are in fact everywhere. They are used for so many different things, and are now even becoming self controlled.






With the development of these robots, being used in factories to make things such as cars, it's not extreme to suggest they could soon be used for more personal activities.

Alan Turing is known as the father of Artificial Intelligence. He was a great computer scientist and invented a machine that could judge the intelligence of other machines, leading other scientists to wonder and suspect about the invention of an electronic brain.

Artificial Intelligence has been explored a lot in popular culture, making it a very popular theme for lots of films, books and television programmes.


While robots have shown to be mechanical versions of human, they are not yet entirely human. Obviously, they do not have all the features we do as humans, such as a beating heart, organs and flesh. Perhaps more importantly, they don't have the privilege of having free will and thought. They are always controlled by humans, such as this CHARLI robot. However humans can sometimes be controlled by machines, for example a pacemaker controls a human heart. There is always that question of what will happen if robots someone obtain free thinking and will? Could it literally mean the end of man kind being the top of the animal kingdom? Would they be able to be stopped? Although this seems somewhat ridiculous and extreme, the thought of a mechanical heart also seemed ridiculous and extreme, and that has become a common medical practice.






Digital Voices - Computer-mediated Communications.

For the past 30/40 years, we have all at some point in our lives, some much frequently than others, been communicating through a media/technology device. This method of communication started way before 30/40 years ago when it came into mainstream society.

Forms of communications have changed and been developed throughout thousands thousands of years. Reading and writing was well enough, however the actual sending and receiving of the message was the tricky part. Communicating at a distance is pretty cheap now, with the invention of the postal service and telephone and e-mail devices. Previously, messages had to be physically sent to one another. This often depended on how fast a person could run or how fast and far they could ride their horse. These times were often for war and times of calling for help. A much faster method that could go further was lighting beacons. This was seen in The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIhnYFRu4ao

Writing is the most obvious form of communication apart from face to face communication Writing and communicating through symbols have dated thousands of years ago, even back to 6000bc, when the Jiahu symbols of Ancient China were found scribed on tortoise shells. Egyptian hieroglyphics are another more popular example of ancient communication through writing.

xprwG41m&t r

The development of languages and properties like the alphabet, meant that spelling, grammar and definitions could be standardised. Bibles and dictionaries were among the first books to be written and published. The practicalities of hand writing these massive books and the ever changing additions to the dictionary meant that nothing was ever entirely accurate or up to date. The limitations of hand writing and the rarity of the actual ability to read and write meant that writing, reading and books were limited to the hands of royalty and people of high status such as priests.

William Caxton is thought to be the first man to introduce the printing press into English society. This is highly significant in the history of communication as it triggered a chain reaction of more books being printed and published, and the result could have been highly different if Caxton had not published anything.

The publishing of a mass of books meant British culture in particular were introduced to literature and more information on a wide scale. In the coming years, telegrams, telegraphs and other methods of communication developed, including national broadcasting through radio where you can get one message out to a lot of people. However the communication here was always one sided, in that you can get one message out instantly however you cannot instantly receive a reply.

The invention of the internet was a breakthrough in itself. However the invention of the electronic mail (e-mail) was an even bigger breakthrough in the terms of communication. The first e-mail was sent in 1971, but wasn't embraced properly until the 1990's, when the world wide web was popularised and computers became more accessible for everyone.

Online Identity

With e-mail being the new method of communication, there was room on the internet for a new form of communication. IM or Instant Messaging was first used in multi-user systems such as UNIX ''talk'' in the 80's to give commands to other users. Social IM'ing took off in the late 80's/early 90's with AOL messenger and IRC chat rooms. Adventure games first used the form of Instant Messaging, however usually in a fantasy mode where they make up stories and follow rules and directions, such as in the Colossal Cave adventure. This form of IMing carried on developing for a few years. For younger generations, MSN was the popular form of IMing, as it was free and easily accessible.



As well as e-mailing, IMing and communicating via the internet, another phenomenon was happening not to far away. Texting/SMSing was the next craze, with the first real text being sent in 1992 by Neil Papworth, via the Vodaphone network. http://www.thegeminigeek.com/who-invented-texting/

IM'ing was the beginning of what would be known as social networking. MySpace, Facebook and Twitter are the main sites which define social networking. However, like the crazes which have come before them, some social networking sites have literally died out.

Facebook and Twitter are undoubtedly the most popular social networking sites today.

MySpace, Bebo, Piczo (R.I.P), and Hi5 are among the social networking sites that used to be popular. Each sites had their own characteristics, some dedicated to music (MySpace) some to website making (Piczo) and some simply to keep in contact with friends (Bebo and Hi5). So why did they close down or become less popular?  Facebook.

Facebook has over 800 million users, and it's hard to find anyone in the age range of around 13-40 who hasn't got one, or at least used to have one. Facebook makes it very easy to stay in contact with as well as meet new people. It enables you to see photo's and videos of you and your friends, it has a massive sharing content with lots of 'fan' pages for celebrities and other things you may have an interest it.

There are many explanations for why Facebook is so popular. It really depends on who you ask and why they use it. Most people would say to keep in contact with friends as it's free, quick and easy. There is always the possibility that Facebook will die out, however in contrast to the ones that have, the timing is right. More people are using the internet and have better access to the internet immediately than ever before, therefore people have the means to keep their accounts going. 








History of technology/Myth of technology p.1

The invention and the popularisation of the internet among other technical devices have led society to let a number of cultural factors influence the way we see and understand such things.

The progression of the internet in itself is astonishing, and the people who made these developments also brought about many 'myths' of the technology they were creating, also leading society into false beliefs.

''Technology'' can be the name for many things. As established previously, technology can relate from a pencil to a helicopter. In this instance of referring to technology as technological devices that we stereotype it with today.

Firstly, 'static electricity' was first discovered in 600 b.c by Thales of Miletus who wrote about amber being rubbed together and charging, creating electricity.

A thousand years later, in 1600 William Gilbert used the latin word for amber to make 'electricity'.

For the next few hundred years, electric technology developed further and further to make things like a running motor, new chemicals and properties found to make stronger electrical charges, and gas. Leading from this, clean water, lighting and communications through electrical means were brought into mainstream society, changing the way humans function in their everyday lives.

With all this progression, there is the question of what could possibly be next?

What can we learn from the history of technology?

With the mass expansion of technology, referring to the last century, we can learn that human kind are an adaptive and inventive race. We have completely changed our way of life, as the web affects almost every aspect of every day life. More than half of today's jobs involve a computer, even if you haven't gone into the computing industry. Social networking has impacted our home and social lives with websites like Facebook and Twitter. These sites also affect the way we receive news.

The company ''Xerox PARC'' have been a massive influence in the development of computing. Some of their most famous releases:

  • Ethernet (cable)
  • Laser printing
  • Personal home computer
  • Graphical user interface (GUI) - enables the interface to be controlled via electronic devices as opposed to text commands. 
Xerox are also known for collaborating with the giant Apple company, firstly releasing the Apple Macintosh (more commonly known as a Mac)

Cyberspace"A consensual hallucination experienced daily by billions of legitimate operators, in every nation, by children being taught mathematical concepts...A graphical representation of data abstracted from the banks of every computer in the human system. Unthinkable complexity. Lines of light ranged in the non-space of the mind, clusters and constellations of data. Like city lights, receding..."
(William Gibson - Author.)

Cyberspace could be seen almost as a community. An online community with millions of bits of information and millions of users, like another world or country. Like a country, it has it's own rules and declarations.

A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace:

by John Perry Barlow <barlow@eff.org>

Governments of the Industrial World, you weary giants of flesh and steel, I come from Cyberspace, the new home of Mind. On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather.
We have no elected government, nor are we likely to have one, so I address you with no greater authority than that with which liberty itself always speaks. I declare the global social space we are building to be naturally independent of the tyrannies you seek to impose on us. You have no moral right to rule us nor do you possess any methods of enforcement we have true reason to fear.
Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. You have neither solicited nor received ours. We did not invite you. You do not know us, nor do you know our world. Cyberspace does not lie within your borders. Do not think that you can build it, as though it were a public construction project. You cannot. It is an act of nature and it grows itself through our collective actions.
You have not engaged in our great and gathering conversation, nor did you create the wealth of our marketplaces. You do not know our culture, our ethics, or the unwritten codes that already provide our society more order than could be obtained by any of your impositions.
You claim there are problems among us that you need to solve. You use this claim as an excuse to invade our precincts. Many of these problems don't exist. Where there are real conflicts, where there are wrongs, we will identify them and address them by our means. We are forming our own Social Contract . This governance will arise according to the conditions of our world, not yours. Our world is different.
Cyberspace consists of transactions, relationships, and thought itself, arrayed like a standing wave in the web of our communications. Ours is a world that is both everywhere and nowhere, but it is not where bodies live.
We are creating a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force, or station of birth.
We are creating a world where anyone, anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.
Your legal concepts of property, expression, identity, movement, and context do not apply to us. They are all based on matter, and there is no matter here.
Our identities have no bodies, so, unlike you, we cannot obtain order by physical coercion. We believe that from ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the commonweal, our governance will emerge . Our identities may be distributed across many of your jurisdictions. The only law that all our constituent cultures would generally recognize is the Golden Rule. We hope we will be able to build our particular solutions on that basis. But we cannot accept the solutions you are attempting to impose.
In the United States, you have today created a law, the Telecommunications Reform Act, which repudiates your own Constitution and insults the dreams of Jefferson, Washington, Mill, Madison, DeToqueville, and Brandeis. These dreams must now be born anew in us.
You are terrified of your own children, since they are natives in a world where you will always be immigrants. Because you fear them, you entrust your bureaucracies with the parental responsibilities you are too cowardly to confront yourselves. In our world, all the sentiments and expressions of humanity, from the debasing to the angelic, are parts of a seamless whole, the global conversation of bits. We cannot separate the air that chokes from the air upon which wings beat.
In China, Germany, France, Russia, Singapore, Italy and the United States, you are trying to ward off the virus of liberty by erecting guard posts at the frontiers of Cyberspace. These may keep out the contagion for a small time, but they will not work in a world that will soon be blanketed in bit-bearing media.
Your increasingly obsolete information industries would perpetuate themselves by proposing laws, in America and elsewhere, that claim to own speech itself throughout the world. These laws would declare ideas to be another industrial product, no more noble than pig iron. In our world, whatever the human mind may create can be reproduced and distributed infinitely at no cost. The global conveyance of thought no longer requires your factories to accomplish.
These increasingly hostile and colonial measures place us in the same position as those previous lovers of freedom and self-determination who had to reject the authorities of distant, uninformed powers. We must declare our virtual selves immune to your sovereignty, even as we continue to consent to your rule over our bodies. We will spread ourselves across the Planet so that no one can arrest our thoughts.
We will create a civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace. May it be more humane and fair than the world your governments have made before.

Davos, Switzerland

February 8, 1996.

This text makes it literally seem like a new land has been discovered and it is being claimed. In a way, cyberspace is a different world in which you can indulge yourself and get away from your own life. The internet is so broad that there are so many things to do and look at, you can use it as a form of escapism

A question set to us to think about was ''Does history help me understand my own relationship with technology?'' 

Personally, knowing how much progress has been made and how much time and effort has been put into inventions that I take for granted, such as mobile phones and the internet makes me appreciate them. 
Looking at how far we've come in terms of discovery and invention, it's unreal to think we could have even more complex technology in centuries to come. I realise that I am dependant on certain technologies such as my phone and the internet for everyday things. The University uses the internet to send us messages and give us help and guidance with our work, without it it would be a lot harder to obtain information quickly. It makes me wonder what else could possibly be achieved using technology?











Identity and representation in Social Media and Games.

Identity  can have quite a broad definition. Put shortly, your identity is what makes you you. Everyone has their own individual identity. Features which make up your identity, such as your name, appearance and characteristics are easily changed in an online environment.

There are many things which can effect a persons representation of their identity. Your gender, geographical location, class, political views and other features can attribute to the representation you give of yourself. For example, if you wore dark clothes, had piercings, listened to metal music and were friends with people with the same interests, you may be in the subculture 'goths' and that would be how people saw you. This would then become part of your identity.

With the popularity of social networking, it'd be hard to find someone without a Facebook or Twitter account, or at least some form of social networking activity in the past, such as MySpace or Bebo which are now less used thanks to the popularity and mainstream use of Facebook and Twitter.  On the internet, no-one knows who you are. If you put in false details in an account, no-one would know who you really are, because how can they possibly prove it?

''On our personal homepage, however, we can manipulate all the elements until we are satisfied.'' - Goffman & Identity - Charles Cheung, Presentations of Self on Personal Homepages, in web.studies, p. 47



With sites like Facebook and Twitter, you have to fill out a profile giving details about you. They ask for your name, age, gender, e-mail address and other details. You also have the choice to put in pictures and other information about yourself, such as hobbies and interests. 

In a face to face meeting, it is hard to conceal your initial identity, your gender, age, location etc. People often judge someone within the first 5 seconds of meeting them. First impressions and conversations often mould the way people see each other. Online, you have the chance to act differently how you would in a real face to face conversation, because you have the protection of physical concealment. You could quite literally become anyone. There are obviously safety risks which come with this. Online grooming has arisen as a big problem online. This is where young people, in fact anyone is talking/communicating online with someone they think they know, however this person turns out to be entirely different. These people often try to get their victims to meet up with them or even send sexually explicit pictures of themselves over the web. The obvious problems that arise here include paedophilia, abduction and even rape.


Online, you have the opportunity to alter who you are. On a profile, you could pretend you are a world class sailor and have the photo's to prove it. You can change the music you like, you can put up certain pictures which show you in an entirely different light to how you usually look and what you normally do. You can post pictures to show how many friends you have, or perhaps that you have a love interest. You can exaggeration your own life or completely make one up. 

Most online profiles are supposedly private however there are ways in which anyone can access them. Pictures on facebook will show up on any search engine if you search the right tags. For example, my name 'Jonika Kinchin' is quite unusual. I actively use Facebook and Twitter and use my real name on both websites. Having google imaged my name, I discovered:





All these images are from social networking sites such as Facebook and Bebo some years ago. Some are even from a college website from about a year ago. This shows not only that it's very easy to find someone on the internet if you know what to search and where to look, but that I could never really make a new identity for myself as these images will still be on the internet and easy to find.









Towards Ubiquity?

 Ubiquity is used to describe the diffusion of computing technologies throughout our environment through increasing miniaturization and the development of smart (i.e. predictive) computing applications. Therefore the idea that computers will soon be an embedded function of our physical environments

Ubiquity = being everywhere. 

Terry Flew p. 430 New  Media: A Critical Introduction.

With the advancements of technology being used to aid, produce and even become human life, it is considered that technology is quite literally everywhere. It has become almost impossible to lead life in western society and other materially rich parts of the globe in 2012 without the use of any digital technology.

This text is being produced and evaluated through technology. The result will be given through technology. As previously mentioned, technology is in our lives, in our bodies and even in our minds. This can cause question of whether we truly have any privacy or anonymity.

Phones and the internet are the most common digital technology used in everyday life. With these two being combined, using Wifi & 3G data networks,  hacking personal and professional data and information has most probably never been easier.



Other less obvious devices can track a person, such as store reward cards which can see what you've brought as well as when and which store you were in. They also usually require your personal details such as date and birth and address.


Another card which can track you even easier is the London oyster card, which shows which stations you've been in when and what time.



There are many other ways in which you can be tracked by technology in which you would never even think. Even GPS systems and SATNAV car systems can be hacked and made available for tracking.

In regards to being tracked online, social networking makes this so much easier to find someone, with many purposes of the social networking sites are to find people you may have perhaps lost contact with, such as www.friendsreunited.co.uk, as well as the more obvious examples such as Facebook and MySpace, where there is a toolbar which lets you search for a particular person, using their name and any details you may know.





Instant Messaging and E-mail logs are also kept on computer memory devices. It is simple and quite easy to access any conversation you've had. With the growing popularity of Social Networking and Instant Messaging, more and more messages were being exchanged on the internet. On each account you have mini conversation windows with other account users, simpler and quicker than E-mails. This is then saved in your conversation history and it is easy to look back at what has been said. Recently, years old Facebook posts have been appearing on people's timelines, according to a French Metro company.







Privacy is an interesting concept which can be described in many ways. Put simply, it means to have the right to keep what ever it is confidential and to have the right so converse information for yourself, what ever that maybe. It can also be used to describe 'being private' so you may have something or somewhere that is physically private to you. Privacy concerning the internet and social networking relates to keeping things confidential. With a system that's so complex however so easy to access to anyone, it'd be hard to keep much private. Particularly with search engines and word triggers, personal details such as home address or date of birth would be very easy to find if you have submitted them onto any sort of social networking sites, which usually require these details. These details would show up on any search engine as you have submitted them to the world wide web and are very unlikely to ever have them fully removed from the internet.




There are certain laws which cover surveillance on the internet. In some extreme cases, surveillance can be considered a crime and lawful action can be taken. Surveillance can cover anything from online banking details to cookies on the web to social networking. The fact is that you are watched on the internet at all times. Even when you submit personal financial details on internet banking sites, there is always someone watching and controlling that database which will see your details. If there are problems with your online banking, you would have to talk to a customer service provider which would mean your actions are being watched and details that are supposed to be kept very private are exposed and shared.



The idea that everything we do on the web is being watched is similar to the 'Big Brother' phenomenon, in that anything you do will not be kept private. To say that technology is become ubiquitous would be an entirely sensible thing to say. Almost everything we do involves being online. To submit this blog, an online service has to be used and the feedback will almost certainly be delivered electronically via the web. Technology is literally everywhere. You can pay by card almost anywhere, the initial way of communication has become via the phone or social networking, and we spend ridiculous amounts of hours online every week for all sorts of reasons.



Tuesday 8 January 2013

Before you accept, please read this Terms and Conditions.

Does anyone actually read the terms and conditions?

They're everywhere on the internet. Whatever you sign up for has their own set of terms and conditions. Like the small print in a contract, they are often forgotten about or slyly worded  into tricking you into a false sense of security. In terms of social networking, sites have their own terms and conditions to warn their users of consequences and rules of the site. Facebook is one of the most popular social networking sites on the Internet today. 

Facebooks terms and conditions uses a lot of fancy words which are quite convincing in making you believe they are only after your safety on the web, one of the first lines you read is ''Your privacy is very important to us''. Obviously it is, as our private details are what attract advertisers. Facebook uses our details and what we write on Facebook to sell to advertisers. They also look at our activity on Facebook to see what we like and what we don't, so they know who to advertise their products too which would be most successful

Under the subheading ''Registration and Account Security'', number 7 claims:

''You will keep your contact information accurate and up-to-date.''

Ever got a random phone call asking if you were home and were you interested in Sky TV and did you want to upgrade? Yet you've never contacted Sky and have no idea how they got your details?

Well, your Facebook account is the answer. 

















Safety

We do our best to keep Facebook safe, but we cannot guarantee it. We need your help to keep Facebook safe, which includes the following commitments by you:

  1. You will not post unauthorized commercial communications (such as spam) on Facebook.
  2. You will not collect users' content or information, or otherwise access Facebook, using automated means (such as harvesting bots, robots, spiders, or scrapers) without our prior permission.
  3. You will not engage in unlawful multi-level marketing, such as a pyramid scheme, on Facebook.
  4. You will not upload viruses or other malicious code.
  5. You will not solicit login information or access an account belonging to someone else.
  6. You will not bully, intimidate, or harass any user.
  7. You will not post content that: is hate speech, threatening, or pornographic; incites violence; or contains nudity or graphic or gratuitous violence.
  8. You will not develop or operate a third-party application containing alcohol-related, dating or other mature content (including advertisements) without appropriate age-based restrictions.
  9. You will follow our Promotions Guidelines and all applicable laws if you publicize or offer any contest, giveaway, or sweepstakes (“promotion”) on Facebook.
  10. You will not use Facebook to do anything unlawful, misleading, malicious, or discriminatory.
  11. You will not do anything that could disable, overburden, or impair the proper working or appearance of Facebook, such as a denial of service attack or interference with page rendering or other Facebook functionality.
  12. You will not facilitate or encourage any violations of this Statement or our policies.
These safety policies seem completely fair and easy to follow. However, people still find it appropriate to use Facebook as a weapon. There have been many incidents involving cyber bullying which have led people, mainly younger children to resort to drastic measures, sometimes even suicide. Hate pages and 'trolls' are a problem which has recently hit headlines


If I were to be the next Mark Zuckerberg and create a massive social networking site, my terms and conditions would be slightly different. Instead of using advertising as the main way of collecting profit from the website, I would charge each member 50p/economic equivalent (this site is global) when they sign up, and that's the only payment you have to make. I would involve advertising but only when extra features are used on the site, such as viewing and sharing videos, I would allow advertisements to be played before the video, similar to YouTube. 

My Terms and Conditions:


1. You will not use bullying or intimidation towards another user.

2. You will use your real name or the name in which you are known. 

3.You will not use a picture of someone you do not know to pass them off as yourself.

4.You will not use this site to post photographic or videographic material that glorifies any act of violence. 

5.You will only post photographic or videographic material with the person in the materials permission. 

6.You will not be misleading with the information you give - i.e giving the wrong age. 

7.You will not create another account in someone else's name.

8.You will not create any group pages or club pages intimidating or discriminating against any other person. 

9.You will not use extreme profanity 

10.You will not express racist, sexist, homophobic, prejudice or any discriminating views of any kind towards another user. 

11.You will not use sexually explicit/pornographic language or photographic/videographic images. 

On the grounds of ownership and copyright, as soon as you upload any photo or video onto the site, Facebook have the right to do what they want with it without your say. Most recently, the application ''Instagram'' changed their terms and conditions in that they have the right to use anyone's material in their advertising campaign. In other words, your online life is not yours to own. 















Open Access

Open Access refers to academic texts and journals being accessible and free to everyone via the Internet. Usually, academic works such as research findings and articles summarising and showing information are in the form of physical books that are paid for, like any other book.

With the idea of 'free' reading, there are obviously economic issues regarding payment to the author and publishing companies, as well as royalties and other publishing issues. The concept of the ''common good'' comes into action here, in that publishing and allowing the public to view these established academic works is positive and beneficial for society, in that there are no limitations or prejudice in regards to the individual and any contributing factors which may have limited them to accessing these works previously. One limitation is the pricing of the books. As any University student could vouch for, text books are not cheap. The Internet will always be used for research, simply because it's so quick and easy, not to mention literally free. However, the Internet cannot always be 100% reliable.

''Many journals now cost more than $20,000 for a year’s subscription.'' - Robert Darnton is Carl H. Pforzheimer University Professor and Director of the University Library at Harvard University, USA. 

Having well researched, completely reliable sources that can be accessed so quickly and freely is so beneficial to society that the distribution of knowledge has gone wider than ever before in that you do not have to be a specific type of person in order to access new and more complex information. 

There will obviously always be issues with the distribution of free knowledge. Some of the most debated issues are listed below.

-'Traditional' academic publishing - Peer review/ professional publishing. 

-Issues of cost, access and distribution

-Issues of knowledge circulation and inequality

-Effect on wider society

-Opportunities and Challenges - standards, 'green' archive. 

In regards to the publishing side, Professor Dame Jane Finch, a sociologist at the University of Manchester states here that open access could cost the publishing industry up to £60m per year, however with the falling subscription prices, it will welcome economic growth and be beneficial for everyone. Universities are currently paying up to £200m for access to certain scientific journals that have been criticised for 'locking' away their works. The Internet is obviously relatively free and so ridiculously popular that it is part of everyday life to use the internet, with 2,405,518,376 Internet users from June 2012. With the amount of people who use the Internet, there will be a large percentage who use it for academic purposes, be it for educational, work, or just curiosity purposes. Wider society will benefit from having access to academia, it will entitle literally anyone to find out about whatever they want. It is possible that it will also strengthen the education system, in that students will have better access to research that they can investigate themselves. There is always the backlash of giving students the 'easy' option, however if the 'easy' option is more beneficial for everyone, why not take it? 

Another highly understandable issue about Open Access that hasn't been mentioned much is that of copyright and plagiarism. There has always been the issue with copying from books, however the internet is so much broader than books could ever be, in that there are millions and millions of pages, meaning the sources of information are scattered and if not referenced properly, could be almost impossible to find. You cannot delete a book, however you can a webpage. There will always be plagiarism, and Open Access could increase that, however with the more complex marking systems used by schools and universities, such as Turnitin, Plagiarism is a lot simpler to control, as the programme can search the whole web for similarities in the students work and anything available on the internet. With textbooks and journals online, this makes it easier to see if a student has copied from a textbook instead of the actual internet. This makes teachers and examiners jobs easier and simpler as the process isn't long winded, and they are able to spend more time on each paper, giving more precise and true marks. 

The pro's and con's of Open Access will always be weighed up against each other. The pro's are much more beneficial long term. They benefit more of society than banning the movement would. The argument that it would follow with an economic downfall for the publishing industry is worrying however alternative plans can be put into action, and as Professor Finch suggested, the industry will boost again and it will be long term beneficial.